Perancangan Sistem Asisten Produktivitas Pribadi Cerdas “Prioritas Bot” Menggunakan Large Language Model (LLM) Berbasis N8N dan Telegram

Elita Nur Ilahi; Muhammad Encep; Setyono Setyono

doi:10.70340/jirsi.v5i2.405

Authors

Elita Nur Ilahi Universitas Djuanda
Muhammad Encep Universitas Djuanda
Setyono Setyono Universitas Djuanda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70340/jirsi.v5i2.405

Keywords:

Productivity Assistant, Large Language Model (LLM), n8n, Workflow Automation, Telegram Bot, Prototyping

Abstract

The complexity of task and workflow management in the digital era necessitates intelligent assistive tools. This study designs an Intelligent Personal Productivity Assistant System by integrating three primary components: (1) A Large Language Model (LLM) GPT-4o serving as the processing core for natural language understanding and contextual response generation; (2) The n8n low-code automation platform, acting as an orchestrator to manage workflows and connect the LLM to external APIs such as Google Calendar; and (3) A Telegram Bot utilized as the primary user interface due to its high accessibility. The design methodology employs a Prototyping approach adapted from Pressman & Maxim (2020), enabling iterative development and functional validation. Black Box Testing was applied for functional evaluation, while the System Usability Scale (SUS) was used to measure usability, involving 20 active university students in the Bogor region selected through Purposive Sampling. The research resulted in a functional prototype capable of managing schedules end-to-end via conversational natural language. The system achieved an average SUS score of 88.5 from 20 respondents, classified as Excellent with a Grade A rating, indicating the significant potential of integrating LLMs and workflow automation to effectively enhance personal productivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. M. Sinaga, M. A. S. HSB, N. Farezi, F. A. Lubis, dan A. Perdana, “Pengembangan ‘LOOPA’ Asisten Pengingat Jadwal Pintar Berbasis AI,” JATI, vol. 9, no. 4, hlm. 6118–6125, 2025.

F. Riza, S. J. Al Din, D. Y. Al Afghani, R. Setiabudi, dan Wibisono, “LLM-Based Self-Related Local AI Agent Design through N8N Orchestration for Conversational Memory on RAG,” INTECOMS, vol. 8, no. 3, hlm. 939–946, 2025.

J. Sweller, “Cognitive Load Theory,” dalam Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 55, Academic Press, 2011, hlm. 37–76.

B. K. Britton dan A. Tesser, “Effects of Time-Management Practices on College Grades,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 83, no. 3, hlm. 405–410, 1991.

S. Bellman, R. F. Potter, S. Treleaven-Hassard, J. A. Robinson, dan D. Varan, “The Effectiveness of Branded Mobile Phone Apps,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, vol. 25, no. 4, hlm. 191–200, 2011.

A. Oulasvirta, T. Rattenbury, L. Ma, dan E. Raita, “Habits Make Smartphone Use More Pervasive,” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 16, no. 1, hlm. 105–114, 2012.

K. Church dan R. de Oliveira, “What’s Up with WhatsApp? Comparing Mobile Instant Messaging Behaviors,” dalam Proc. 15th Int. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 2013, hlm. 352–361.

A. Bintang, A. L. Hananto, dan A. Hananto, “Telegram Bot Application Development Integration with Google Sheets for Sending Service Reporting,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications, vol. 4, no. 3, hlm. 2208–2214, 2025.

J. Achiam et al., “GPT-4 Technical Report,” arXiv:2303.08774, 2023.

Y. Bramanditya dan W. T. Handoko, “Pengembangan Chatbot WhatsApp Menggunakan Otomatisasi AI untuk Meningkatkan Layanan Informasi Pemerintahan,” Jutisi, vol. 14, no. 2, hlm. 1195–1206, 2025.

R. K. Punithavel dan D. Sivakumer, “Large Language Model Framework for Device Orchestration in Low-Code No-Code Solutions,” IJCESEN, vol. 11, no. 3, hlm. 5559–5565, 2025.

A. R. Hevner et al., “Design Science in Information Systems Research,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 1, hlm. 75–105, 2004.

R. S. Pressman dan B. R. Maxim, Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2020.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2019.

D. Merkel, “Docker: Lightweight Linux Containers for Consistent Development and Deployment,” Linux Journal, vol. 2014, no. 239, 2014.

K. Le, Laragon Documentation: A Fast and Lightweight Development Environment for Modern Web Applications. Laragon Official Reference, 2024.

J. Brooke, “SUS: A ‘Quick and Dirty’ Usability Scale,” dalam Usability Evaluation in Industry, P. W. Jordan et al., Eds. London: Taylor & Francis, 1996, hlm. 189–194.

R. A. Virzi, “Refining the Test Phase of Usability Evaluation: How Many Subjects is Enough?” Human Factors, vol. 34, no. 4, hlm. 457–468, 1992.

J. Nielsen, “Why You Only Need to Test with 5 Users,” Nielsen Norman Group, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/. [Diakses: 01-Apr-2026].

Y. Liu et al., “An Empirical Study on Low Code Programming Using Traditional vs Large Language Model Support,” arXiv:2402.01156, 2024.

A. Bangor, P. T. Kortum, dan J. T. Miller, “An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale,” Int. J. Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 24, no. 6, hlm. 574–594, 2008.

A. Maedche et al., “AI-Based Digital Assistants: Opportunities, Threats, and Research Perspectives,” Business & Information Systems Engineering, vol. 61, no. 4, hlm. 535–544, 2019.

R. López Soto, “Automatización de Procesos con Docker, n8n y Modelos de IA,” Tesis de Grado, Univ. Politécnica de Madrid, 2025.